Group used a series of posters to present information about extracurricular activities. After their brave presentation we developed the evaluation rubric below.
Group Members: Stef, Nick, Alyssa, Stacy, Jen, Kate
Criteria
2 pts
1 pt
0 pts
1.
Presentation made on time.
Yes
No
2.
include an introduction that ties each of the contributions together.
Introduction describes problem or issue, why it is important, and previews or summarizes the research questions pursued by team members.
Introduction exists, but only partially frames the presentation by leaving out one of the elements described at left.
No introduction occurs.
3.
include a significant contribution by each team member.
All team members have a chance to present and/or lead the class in an activity.
Most team members present and /or teach.
One or two members of the team do most of the presenting.
4.
address each research question listed on the online resource page.
Each research question is addressed and specific links to the team's online resources are made.
Some of the research questions are addressed and linked with the team's online resources.
Some of research questions are addressed, but online resources are not mentioned.
5.
provide us with new knowledge as well as new questions about the original topic.
There is lively discussion in class as well as more than 2/3 (more than 20) of the class posting followup feedback online.
There is EITHER sparse discussion in class OR less than 2/3 (less than 20) of the class providing feedback online.
There is sparse classroom discussion AND less than 2/3 (less than 20) of the class providing online feedback.
EDC 102 Final Project Presentation Evaluation
Group Issue: Extracurricular Activities
Group used a series of posters to present information about extracurricular activities. After their brave presentation we developed the evaluation rubric below.
Group Members: Stef, Nick, Alyssa, Stacy, Jen, Kate